Wednesday, 24 June 2020

Wisdom



That young man was walking on the road in his village when he heard these lines from the radio, ‘ILamai ellam veRum kanavumayam idhil maRaindhathu sila kaalam/ theLivum aRiyaamal mudivum theiriyaamal mayangudhu ethirkaalam’ (youth is full of dreams and a part of life is lost already/ future is full of illusions). He was just about 18 then and having seen many ups and down already (more of the former), he thought ‘oh, my life is gone’.

So, was he disillusioned?
Far from it.
But this song impacted him very much because of the character in the movie and most importantly because of the tune.

Sometime later, he heard these lines from a different song ‘Vaazhkkai endRaal aayiram irukkum/vaasal thoRum vedhanai irukkum/vandha thunbam edhu vandhaalum vaadi ninRaal oduvathillai/Edhaiyum thaangum idayam irunthaal iRudi varaikkum amaidi irukkum’( Life is full of problems/Miseries keep knocking at your door and will not go away if you get bogged down/Have a heart of steel and feel the peace till the end) and these lines reinforced his belief and faith in everything. Who that ‘young man’ was will be said a little later (unless you have already guessed it), but now the focus is on the gentleman who wrote those lines.

There are many things unique about KaNNadasan and let me try and list out just a few of these:

1. Spontaneity
He can rattle off words in no time. All he needed were the situation in the movie and details about the character. It is of course not that difficult to reel off meaningless words (ask the present day lyricists) but in Kaviyarasar’s case, each and every letter was meaningful and significant.

2. Aesthetics
Not only were(are) the words meaningful but these were(are) beautiful too. The story of giving 20+ charaNams for ‘Ezhu swarangaLukkuL’ and leaving MSV sir and KB confused(about which one to take and which one to leave) has already been narrated by me in some of my earlier posts.

3. Down to earth
Simplicity was his forte. Hardly did he use any tough or difficult word in his songs. And even complex things would be told in very simple words. See this-
‘Naan kaadal enum kavitai thandhen kattilin mele/Andha karuNaikku naan parisu thandhen thottilin mele’
Can ‘that’ act be put more succinctly?

4. Genuine love for Tamizh
Wherever possible, he would praise the language of Tamizh. In ‘Kallellam maaNikka kallaaguma’, he describes the beauty of a woman. But look at the third line- Sollellaam thooya Tamizh sollaaguma..

5. Range
Of all the points, I find this to be the most defining. Let me explain.
A poet is expected to touch upon or cover many things in life and many great poets in the world have done this. When it comes to film music, the poets (lyricists) have to operate with a lot of constraints. And yet some fabulous songs-which shine with glory - have been written over a period of time. But in my humble opinion, no lyricist other than KaNNadasan has covered so many topics in film songs. I am not going to list out the topics now but let me say that he excelled in romantic songs as much as he excelled in philosophical songs.

Now, see this- Vaazhkkai enbathu vyaapaaram/ varum jananam enbathu varavaagum /adhil maraNam enbadhu selavaagum
(Life is a business/Birth is the credit/ Death is the debit)
Or
SendRavanai kettaal vandhu vidu enbaan/Vandhavanai kettaaL senRu vidu enbaan
(the one who has gone will ask us to come/the one who has come here will ask us to go)      
And to think that this was the same poet who wrote ‘ Naan pesa nanippathellam nee pesa veNdum’ or ‘UNdenRu solvadhundhan kaNNallava, illai endRu solvadhundhan idai allava’….

So much to say about this genius and his works but let me stop here for obvious reasons..
And now for the incident quoted in the beginning..

I am sure many of you would have guessed who that ‘young man’ was. If you haven’t, let me tell you that it was our own Raaja sir.

The Raaja-KaNNadasan combination produced some unforgettable gems in a short period of 5 years. On this special day-the birth anniversary of the genius poet-, let me take up a philosophical song.

NallaveRkellaam SatchigaL ReNdu’ from ‘Thyagam’(1978) has an unmistakable air of serenity and the reason is not far to seek. It has a beautiful tune based on a raga called Vaasanti which is known for its poignant feel, the orchestration is simple and yet piercing and the lyrics are meaningful as always.

It starts with the humming of TMS (though well past his prime, it must be said that he did render the song with aplomb). Of course there is that subtle bell sound too prior to this, but the highlight of the prelude in my opinion is the flute which first gives a sleek silhouette and then moves with unique elegance along with the folk stringed instrument.

The pensive violins give way to the guitar which sounds philosophically in the first interlude. But it is the flute again which steals the show. It moves languorously with that touch of melancholy. The slow circular movement in the end pinches our hearts. Can pinching be so pleasurable too?

The second interlude starts with the violins yet again but this time with western classical contours. The single violin which is superimposed on its own family, is wistful and arresting. But, it is the flute which scores yet again. Steeped in melody, it lends majesty and poise.

And now for the lyrics..

This genius wrote long back that if it is God, it is God/if it is statue, it is just statue(deivam endRaal adhu deivam/veRum silai endRaal adhu silaidhaan).
Now in this song, he says ‘Look at a stone with faith,  and you can see the God there’.
In the first charaNam, he talks about the drying up of rivers and asks who is responsible for that-rivers or the fate.

He invokes the Divine force again in the second charaNamm praising his superior qualities. But what I find most interesting and intriguing are the last two lines where he says ‘ When a person decides to do harm or cause trouble,  he doesn’t cry; Have the heavens ever fallen down on the earth?’

These two lines need a thorough study. Usage of similes is not uncommon in poems. But in this case, the first line talks about negativity while the second line talks about great men. Why this contradiction? Does he equate bad people/deeds with the heavens?

This is where the brilliance of the poet comes to the fore. What he means is this-
Bad people have no sense of remorse. Good people never stoop that level and are always great.

A new dimension to contrasts in poetry..

And this is what sets him apart and makes him an 'Emperor of Poetry!.
Illusions become Dreams and Dreams become Reality when one has faith.
Any doubts? Ask the ‘young man’ who got inspired and subsequently became the unconquered Emperor of Film Music..


Sunday, 21 June 2020

MaarkaNdeya


The universality of Music is too well known and appreciated to be explained again. Yet I write about it again as the topic is more on paper than in practice. What is surprising is that even within our country proponents of the two major classical forms vie with one another to plead ignorance about the other form despite the obvious similarities.

This is where the film music plays a major role in terms of dispelling the ignorance of a majority. Since it is not necessary for a composition in film music to follow a particular grammar, one gets to listen to a mélange of forms in a matter of less than 5 minutes. But let me hasten to add that I am talking about composers who know the real value of each form and are equally knowledgeable about the respective forms.

As we all know, ILaiyaraaja is adept in integrating many forms not just because he loves all forms but also because he knows the intricacies of each form. So, what we get to hear is a synthesis with each form coalescing with the other. But what makes him great is the way the forms mingle without in any way affecting the melody. It in fact enhances the melody.

Take ‘SiRiya PaRavai SiRagai Viriththu PaRakkirathe’ from ‘Andha Oru Nimidam’(1985). The entire song follows the Charukesi scale. If we delve further into this raga/scale, we will know that the Indian melody Charukesi has been in existence in Western Classical form as Melodic Major since time immemorial.

The prelude is entirely in Melodic Major with the keys and the subtle bass guitar sounding a repeat melody which is repeated by the guitar and then by the strings in the higher octave, followed by the brass flute. Note the absence of the percussion here though it does follow a time signature. More on this rhythmic aspect, a little later..
Charukesi is present in the Arabic system as well and this gets reflected in the first half of the first interlude.

We get to see the Carnatic Charukesi in the first interlude with the chorus singing the swaras followed by the flute first and the veena later. Note that the second CharaNam is different from that of the first and the third.
Melodic Major returns in the third interlude with the first half sounding jazzy and the second half symphonic..

The starting music in the prelude, the Pallavi and the beats follow
1 2 3/ 1 2 3/ 1 2 3/ 1 2 3/ 1 2 3 4- with 4 subdivided into 16.

Does it indicate something?

It does, to me...