Attribute

One of the topics which I have discussed quite a number of times in various forums (here, in Orkut Community, and during Geetanjali)- and the one I wouldn’t mind discussing repeatedly- is Ragas and Moods. Indian Classical Music is unique and distinct because of the raga system. There are of course many other features too like the gamaka, sangati, briga, akaaram etc., but all these revolve around ragas.

Talking about the ragas, it is said that each raga evokes a certain kind of emotion. In fact, there is a song from the old film ‘SampoorNa RamayaNam’ in which RaavaNa is asked by his sons, brothers and his wife about the moods of various ragas and he answers the questions musically-singing and playing the veeNa(exquisite rendering by Shri.C.S.Jaraman!).

The Hindustani system of music goes a step further and even classifies each raga as suitable for singing only during a certain time (day or night).

My intention is not to question this or even say that it is all a myth- though I can’t agree with the belief that Mukhari is melancholic or that if one sings Aahiri in the morning, they will starve throughout that day. At the same time, I feel that by restricting the ragas to just some emotions, we are imprisoning not only the ragas but our free thinking.

Our mind always believes what we want to believe and refuses to believe what we do not want to believe.  It always helps to question beliefs. In fact, that is how rationalists came into existence in the world- though this is a different issue and a different topic. In any case, I am not advocating anything here and not for a moment am I saying that all traditional practices must be changed. However, it is better to be convinced about anything after questioning rather than accepting things as they are just because those are part of tradition. This also helps our thinking and also activates our brain.

Apart from this, there is one more angle too. There is a special beauty if one goes off the beaten track and this can only be experienced and can hardly be explained. ‘Being different’ is different and beautiful though one need not be different just for the sake of being different.

As mentioned in many of my posts and also during the Geetanjali Events, ILaiyaraaja , who has a great respect for tradition has time and again challenged some widely held beliefs about the moods of ragas. Not as a rebel but as a true musician. For, there is no trace of arrogance in the deed. On the other hand, it leaves connoisseurs awe stuck and one is left wondering if a particular raga can be used this way too.

He has composed humorous and romantic songs in ‘pathos-evoking’ ragas and melancholic songs in ragas considered to be ‘happy’. In ‘Kotha pittaro koko’ from Detective Narada (1993), he has done the former.

Chakravakam is considered to be a raga for poignant mood even by film music composers. In fact, it sounds more sorrowful in film music than when sung in classical style. However, ‘Kotha pittaro..’ sounds romantic and even erotic. How and why he chooses a particular raga is a question even he will not be able to answer because to him these are spontaneous occurrences.  And anything which has that spontaneity has an unmatched beauty- the ‘aalapanas’ and ’kalpana swaras’ sung in a classical music concert being live examples. So how will ‘Kotha Pittaro’ not sound nice?

It has an unusual start with the sound of cockfight. What follows is a piece on the Sax which sketches a beautiful melody with the flute pitching in now and then and the group of percussion backing with chatushram beats.

It is not the prelude which is different. The structure of Pallavi is different too. The female (Janaki yet again!) sings a line and the male (yes, of course the inimitable SPB) responds in a very different way. Janaki sings for a period of two and half beats (in keezh kaalam) and SPB’s repartee is for one and half beats. And what a repartee it is! 3 ta ka dhi mi s in mel kaalam speaking technically but each line(there are 7 in total) and the reply are different and have their own charm. The 8^th line is only in akaaram (and that too in avarohaNam). If we assume that the Pallavi ends there, it means we do not know ILaiyaraaja enough. It is now the turn of SPB to sing and the turn of Janaki to respond. Finally, it ends with the akaaram of Janaki which gives the essence of Chakravakam.

Can any Pallavi be more beautiful than this? Yes, if it is composed by the Master (read this line in mel kaala chatushram ).

The banter continues in the first interlude too with the wind instruments like the sax and trumpets intercepted by the keys/flute in the first segment and the guitar being ‘replied to’ by the flute in the second segment. Note that this is almost similar to the Pallavi-not in terms of the tune or notes but in terms of the repartee. Playfully playful! In the third segment, the two guitars move with sobriety and play different sets of notes taking us to the first charaNam.

The lines in the CharaNam ooze with melody though there is no ‘repartee’ here. One also sees the different shades of Chakravaham .

The second interlude is another marvel. The sax group plays a melody and it is a different kind of repartee from the group of flutes with the latter playing the same notes as reply. Beyond a point, the Sax& co. starts playing those repetitive notes as if to teach a lesson to the flutes. It can even be taken in a positive sense- the sax decided to join hands with the flute! What happens after this is what makes ILaiyaraaja a composer par excellence. He stops the percussion and as he has done quite a number of times, decides to use the voice of Janaki as a lead instrument. She hums in Chakravakam-though in a different style- and the keys and a host of bass instruments back her gently. This goes on for 6 cycles and indeed takes us to empyrean heights!

How to describe this mood now?

Surely words cannot explain that. Because, after all moods ‘happen’ and are not created..

Check this out on Chirbit