A Carnatic
Musician, known for his contrarian views said something like this, sometime ago- Our appreciation of music depends on the
looks of the musician.(I am not quoting him verbatim, as I do not remember
the exact words and I do not intend to watch that video again, at least for the
time being).
I am in awe of the musician’s voice and musicality and
yet I choose to disagree with him on certain things, in spite of the fact that
his political views almost match that of mine. In any case, I am not going to
talk about what I like about him and what I dislike. But I feel I must express
myself on that particular view of his, as a very normal rasika and more so as a common man.
When we listen to a piece of music, what attracts us? The answer could vary from person
to person because after all, music is subjective.
At the same time, a simple answer is likely to be ‘the pleasantness’. We like a piece of music because we feel it
touches something inside us. We like a piece of music because it makes us emotional. We like a piece of music
because we derive pleasure. We like
a piece of music because we empathise with
it. We like a piece of music because we feel calm.
But do we really care if the musician, who produces it,
has a sharp nose or a small nose, if
he/she has large eyes or eyes of an
elephant, if the person’s skin colour is fair
and lovely or is just simply dark?
If we had done so, then less than 0.1%
of the musicians-and this includes classical, pop, rock, film- would have
survived in this field.
A musician is a musician not because he/she is
handsome/beautiful, but because we feel his/her music is beautiful.
The beauty
in the act of listening to music is that it sets us free and makes our
imagination run riot. We care less for the looks of the musician and more for
the looks of music-that is, the images
the music creates in our mind.
This takes me to something which would seem to be
unrelated to this topic but nevertheless is closely related. Imagine you are
listening to a musical piece which
is part of a background score in a
movie. Now, let us take two scenarios :
(1.) you have
watched the movie,
(2.) you have not
seen the movie.
In scenario (1.),
you probably know as to where the piece
appears and can easily relate it to the story and the sequence. In (2.), neither do you know the story nor
do you know the sequence. So, how do you react to the piece? Do you try
relating it to the hero/heroine or any other actor who you know has acted in
the movie and then base your like/dislike on this factor? In (1.) too even if you know the sequence,
would you look at the piece as just being part
of the movie or would you see it as a musical
piece which makes you see your own images
and gives you pleasure like how a song
would give you?
Think about it.
Now, let me take up a piece which is the Title
Music in a 1981 film called ‘MeeNdum Kokila’. The piece starts with the sound of the aeroplane followed by the sound of the train. It is at the 20th second that the music
really starts-that is, if you don’t consider the sounds of the vehicles as ‘music’.
To ILaiyaraaja, these sounds are
musical anyway. That is why, he leaves them untouched and most importantly,
keeps them as the base. Doesn’t that flute, sound like the horn of the train
and the bass guitar sound like an
aircraft? To add to this, he also gives the sound of the train in the background
(played by instruments).
What is more amazing is the fact that the flute plays in pure Mohanam. The violins which appear a little later, echo the notes of the flute in their own impeccable style. Suddenly the piece undergoes a change with the vamping of the guitar and synth sound(0.34) with the violin continuing the Mohanam(0.38) in a slightly different
manner-different from that of the flute.
If the flute handled Mohanam(in the beginning) as if it was fondling a tiny tot, the violin handles it with a touch of
romance, as if it is conversing with a Lady love.
Together, the three (synth, guitar and the violin) take us through a journey of
joy. Until now(0.50) there is no percussion instrument.
The mridangam
jumps into the fray with a bang(0.51)
playing a quick korvai for half aavartanaa. The guitar, synth and the violin
continue, playing the same melody again for exactly one and half aavartanaas with mridangam entering again after that and yet again playing a korvai for half avartanaa.
The shrill flute
joins(1.01) and continues Mohanam with the mridangam now backing it with its pulsating sound. This goes on for
4 taaLa cycles(aavartanaas). A new instrument enters now(1.17) adding a touch of S.E.Asian
music.
The Laya Raaja
conceives and executes a ‘mini tani
aavartanam’ now(1.23) between mridangam and (surprise surprise!) a
western percussion.
Creativity coupled with innovation is what
differentiates a genius from ‘also rans’.
After that ‘laya vinyaasam’
which also has the traditional ‘kuraippu’(where
the number of syllables keep reducing), the violins play Mohanam (1.39) with the mridangam responding in chatushram.
The piece
starts undergoing a transformation now, with the keys playing a different melody(1.46) and the strings backing
it. The melody from the strings to
the backing of pizzicato(1.56) indicates a different raga(Sri). Most importantly, the strings in higher octave take us to an ethereal world.
Ethereal world it is from 2.15 as the veeNa plays
like the veda mandiram to the backing
of the sympathetic strings. If you
think that the piece will end here
or that it will continue the mandiram,
it means you have not understood the ‘O’Henry
Raaja’.
The strings join
at 2.48 and drench us in a shower of
melody in western classical
style-though following an Indian raga-
while the veeNa enters yet again(2.52) playing the raga Sri with the mridangam
backing it and the strings
responding. It is a pure Indian classical trip again with the flute and the violins joining at 3.10.
The piece culminates with the thunderous mridangam
playing a final korvai.
Now, people who have not watched the movie- What images did this piece give you?
People who have watched the movie/people who know the
story- Did it conjure up images of the
hero/heroine/anybody/anything?
I am sure a majority will answer ‘No’ to the second question.
As regards the first question, no response is likely to
be the same and it will vary from person to person and surely from time to
time.
That is why, Music is beautiful, beautiful irrespective
of what our eyes see...